The social media purge of this past week proves more than ever the importance of building a presence on alternative platforms.
As many of you are already aware, a great purge of many independent content creators has begun, including Dave Cullen of Computing Forever having his channel completely removed from YouTube. While my YouTube channel may be able to fly under the radar for a little while longer, given it is much smaller than the creators who are currently being purged, it is now only a matter of time before independent content creators not in line with YouTube’s political worldview find themselves purged.
It is more important than ever that you follow me on alternative platforms in order to maintain access to my content. Below are the links to BitChute and LBRY, which will become my primary video outlets if and when my YouTube channel is purged. I will also work to get all of my content on BitTube and Dailymotion as well.
Christian Women’s vlogger Tiffany Dawn is back to tell the church that it’s time to stop shaming single people (by which she of course means single women). While I don’t disagree with everything she says in her video, Dawn is ignoring one crucial point. It’s not that churches are deliberately seeking out single women and chastising them for being single. It’s that single women are profusely crying and whining about being single, but then they proceed to blame those who point out that their bad behavior is the reason for their singleness.
This is a response to Tiffany Dawn’s, “Hey Church, Let’s Stop Shaming Single People.” Publishes on her channel on December 29th, 2020.
This video may contain copyrighted content. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for -fair use- for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
HARASSMENT NOTICE
It is not my intention to cause the original video creator(s) to receive any kind of harassment or abuse. It is my intention to provide a counter argument to the claims they have made. While I have no control over the feedback you choose to provide, I ask that you avoid any forms of harassment or abuse.
CHILDREN’S PRIVACY NOTICE
This video is NOT targeted to viewers under the age of 13. I do not collect, use, or disclose information from children on any platform where this video is hosted.
While there are countless romance novels that encompass characters of all ages from all parts of the world across various eras, examine the best sellers and you’re likely to encounter a story that follows the same basic outline:
Chapter 1 introduces the female lead, an early to mid-20’s woman who’s pursuing her dreams amid many difficulties. She’s driven, independent and not going to let anything, a man or otherwise, stand in the way of her showing the world who she is and what she can do.
Enter the male lead, an early to mid-30’s tall, dark, handsome and incredibly ripped billionaire. Never mind how he became a billionaire. He owns some business or something, but he doesn’t really have to put that much effort into it. He’s a true player and womanizer. He has all the time he needs for working out, partying, and sleeping with beautiful women, with the author’s assurance that he’ll remain a billionaire without having to put in any of the time and effort of real entrepreneurs.
Then the Hallmark moment. Our heroine meets the handsome hero through some unrealistic but incredibly entertaining encounter. Despite her reservations, the pair ends up having passionate, mind-blowing intimacy within 72 hours.
The female lead might experience some confusion or reservation after the fact, but for the male lead this is the key moment in the story. Sure, everyone knows he’s a player with plenty of beautiful women at his fingertips, but our heroine is different. With this girl, the intimacy was so passionate. So utterly amazing and pleasurable that he knows he’ll never be happy again without her in his life. Almost overnight, the once wild and free bad boy transforms into a dedicated and faithful provider, committed to doing whatever is necessary to keep the female lead in his life.
Finally, after some brief drama, the pair marries and lives happily ever after.
So, what’s wrong with it? Nothing technically. There’s nothing wrong with reading a work of fiction and enjoying it as a work of fiction. However, have you ever encountered a woman who has a history of dating jerks, yet can’t stop complaining about how badly she wants to find a good man, settle down, and get married. A quick search of everything from women’s blogs to reddit threads confirms there is no shortage of these women available. They say they want good men as opposed to jerks, but when a man they acknowledge to be a good comes by, they inevitably leave him to go be with a jerk again. What’s going on?
The truth is, these women aren’t actually being honest about what they want. It’s not that they want a bad boy or a good man. They’re looking to make their life into a romance novel. What they want is an exciting, hot, bad boy, who they then transform into a committed and faithful husband through the power of great intimacy and their own feminine charms. Every woman wants to be the woman who can successfully tie down the womanizer because she herself is just that good.
Do women ever succeed in this endeavor? Maybe sometimes, but much like the lottery, for every winner you find, you’ll find millions of people who lost. Yet for some reason those people keep blowing their money on lottery tickets when it could be put towards worthwhile investments.
Now don’t get me wrong. I don’t believe there’s anything wrong with reading and writing fiction and enjoying it. However, when you’re planning out a lifelong romantic strategy based on a formula that exists almost exclusively in fiction, you shouldn’t be surprised that it tends not to work out. If you think you’re going to transform a womanizer into quality husband through your own sheer awesomeness and great intimacy, well there’s a reason we go to physics textbooks and not sci-fi novels if we want information about the physical universe.
And that is My 2 Cents. Take it for what it’s worth.
This video may contain copyrighted content. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for -fair use- for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
HARASSMENT NOTICE
It is not my intention to cause the original video creator(s) to receive any kind of harassment or abuse. It is my intention to provide a counter argument to the claims they have made. While I have no control over the feedback you choose to provide, I ask that you avoid any forms of harassment or abuse.
CHILDREN’S PRIVACY NOTICE
This video is NOT targeted to viewers under the age of 13. I do not collect, use, or disclose information from children on any platform where this video is hosted.
“Big Government” isn’t the problem, says Briahna Joy Gray. Rather it’s the people running the government. Strangely, she fails to mention who exactly is supposed to replace the people running the government. Join me as we debunk “Is ‘Big Government’ Really the Problem?” The latest piece of nonsense posted on September 28th, 2020 by the Gravel Institute.
This video was requested by my patron Mikail the Stray Cat. All patrons who pledge $15 per month or more on Patreon or SubscribeStar are guaranteed to have their video requests made.
Moseley, G. B. (2008). The U.S. Health Care Non-System, 1908-2008. AMA Journal of Ethics, 10(5), 324–331. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2008.10.5.mhst1-0805
This video may contain copyrighted content. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for -fair use- for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
HARASSMENT NOTICE
It is not my intention to cause the original video creator(s) to receive any kind of harassment or abuse. It is my intention to provide a counter argument to the claims they have made. While I have no control over the feedback you choose to provide, I ask that you avoid any forms of harassment or abuse.
CHILDREN’S PRIVACY NOTICE
This video is NOT targeted to viewers under the age of 13. I do not collect, use, or disclose information from children on any platform where this video is hosted.
Fordham Law School Professor Zephyr Teachout has released a video for The Gravel Institute titled, “Capitalism vs. Freedom.” In it, she argues that capitalism results in ruthless monopolies that mercilessly dictate the lives of every person within the economy. However, like every other critic of capitalism, she conflates voluntary transactions in the free market with government regulations, then advocates greater power for government to fix the problems that the government caused.
This video was requested by my patron Mikail the Stray Cat. All patrons who pledge $15 per month or more on Patreon or SubscribeStar are guaranteed to have their video requests made.
Moseley, G. B. (2008). The U.S. Health Care Non-System, 1908-2008. AMA Journal of Ethics, 10(5), 324–331. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2008.10.5.mhst1-0805
This video may contain copyrighted content. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for -fair use- for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
HARASSMENT NOTICE
It is not my intention to cause the original video creator(s) to receive any kind of harassment or abuse. It is my intention to provide a counter argument to the claims they have made. While I have no control over the feedback you choose to provide, I ask that you avoid any forms of harassment or abuse.
CHILDREN’S PRIVACY NOTICE
This video is NOT targeted to viewers under the age of 13. I do not collect, use, or disclose information from children on any platform where this video is hosted.
Christian Women’s YouTuber Tiffany Dawn has recently put out a video titled, “There’s NOTHING WRONG With You.” In it, she tells young women that their singleness is not their fault, and there’s really nothing they need to worry about when a guy rejects them or they can’t manage to find a relationship. While it’s certainly true that not every relationship works out, this kind of, “it’s not your fault” message only feeds the selfish, entitled attitudes that far too many women suffer from today.
This video may contain copyrighted content. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for -fair use- for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
HARASSMENT NOTICE
It is not my intention to cause the original video creator(s) to receive any kind of harassment or abuse. It is my intention to provide a counter argument to the claims they have made. While I have no control over the feedback you choose to provide, I ask that you avoid any forms of harassment or abuse.
CHILDREN’S PRIVACY NOTICE
This video is NOT targeted to viewers under the age of 13. I do not collect, use, or disclose information from children on any platform where this video is hosted.
Vox recently released a video titled, “What Black Lives Matter means to an 11-year-old.” Allegedly, the video contains a speech that an 11-year-old named Jolia gave at her fifth grade graduation this year. Sadly, all the video demonstrates is that radical parents are forcing their children to live in fear despite there being no evidence to back up their assertions.
James, L., James, S. M., & Vila, B. J. (2019). The reverse racism effect: Are cops more hesitant to shoot Black than White suspects? Criminology & Public Policy,19(1), 361-361. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12483
This video may contain copyrighted content. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for -fair use- for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
HARASSMENT NOTICE
It is not my intention to cause the original video creator(s) to receive any kind of harassment or abuse. It is my intention to provide a counter argument to the claims they have made. While I have no control over the feedback you choose to provide, I ask that you avoid any forms of harassment or abuse.
CHILDREN’S PRIVACY NOTICE
This video is NOT targeted to viewers under the age of 13. I do not collect, use, or disclose information from children on any platform where this video is hosted.
Women forget that men don’t owe them respect anymore than they owe men sex.
A quick survey of the internet will reveal that women everywhere are fed up with male dating entitlement. This isn’t unique to any one age group, social group, or physical location. From New York to Los Angeles and beyond, women are sharing their horror stories about men.
The up and coming professional woman relays how her co-worker thought that picking up the bar tab would entitle him to spicy action in bed later that night. Outrageous. The young college freshman whines about how that geeky guy from third period actually had the audacity to think that helping her with her homework meant he was entitled to dating her. Disgusting. The specifics of each situation vary, but the message is the same.
No matter how many nice things you do for her, she owes you nothing in return.
They’re Right, Women Don’t Owe Men
I’m happy to say that I 100% agree with the girls on this. Women are individuals with their own wants and needs. You are owed nothing simply because you want it, and there are indeed men who act like they’re being cheated when the females in their lives don’t respond favorably to their advances.
To all the men who may be reading this. No matter who you are. No matter who she is. She does not owe you sex, a date, or anything else, regardless of what you might have done for her.
However, there’s something else that’s equally true, and it’s something that far fewer mainstream writers and creators are discussing, and that’s this.
Men don’t owe women anything either.
Why is No One Talking about This?
The funny thing about all the bloggers and publications pushing this message condemning male dating entitlement, is that they’re also the same ones asking, where have all the good men gone? Why do successful women have such trouble finding dateable men? Why can I never seem to get a man to commit to me?
Asking the questions themselves may be worthwhile, but the very same women who condemn male dating entitlement are also concluding that it’s men who are responsible for the lack of relationship satisfaction so pertinent among females.
Take a look at the average dating profile of a woman these days and it quickly becomes clear that there a few things that just about every woman would like to see in the men they date. “Prefer men who are six feet tall or taller.” “Prefer six figure income or higher.” “Prefer muscular build to someone who’s skinny.” The list could go on.
None of this is wrong of course, women are free to pursue whatever type of man they wish for whatever reason they wish. However, it should go without saying that if women choose only to pursue a small minority of men that meet their listed preferences, they have a much lower chance of securing commitment from such a man, and this isn’t the fault of those men.
And Yet Women Complain
Have you ever heard a woman complain about how men are eternal man-children who only want casual relationships and refuse to commit?
Newsflash ladies, men don’t owe you commitment.
How about men refuse to show women respect or treat them well?
Sorry, but men don’t owe you respect either.
The thing is, while it’s true that women don’t owe men anything, the sword cuts both ways. If a woman wants to complain about male dating entitlement, then she has no grounds on which to complain when the men she wants to date aren’t interested in her.
When it comes to relationships, what every person, man or woman, needs to realize is that you are the one deciding what relationships you’re going to pursue, and the other party is not obligated to give you what you’re looking for. If your terms for a relationship aren’t mutually beneficial for your desired partner, you shouldn’t be surprised when they aren’t interested.
Want to be in a relationship, but can’t seem to find one to your liking? I guarantee that if you lower your standards enough, you’ll be in a relationship in no time.
“But I don’t just want any man. I want a good man, who commits to me and respects me!”
Good for you sweetheart, and I want a harem of beautiful women who don’t mind sharing me. Doesn’t mean I’m entitled to it.
Lower your standards enough, and you will be able to secure a relationship, but always remember, men don’t owe you anything, anymore than you owe sex to a man you’re not attracted to.
And that is my 2 cents. Take it for what it’s worth.
This video may contain copyrighted content. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for -fair use- for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
HARASSMENT NOTICE
It is not my intention to cause the original video creator(s) to receive any kind of harassment or abuse. It is my intention to provide a counter argument to the claims they have made. While I have no control over the feedback you choose to provide, I ask that you avoid any forms of harassment or abuse.
CHILDREN’S PRIVACY NOTICE
This video is NOT targeted to viewers under the age of 13. I do not collect, use, or disclose information from children on any platform where this video is hosted.
Writing for Reason Magazine, author Jacob Sullum has published two articles in defense of Netflix’s controversial film Cuties. Despite the fact that free speech includes speech that is disgusting or distasteful, a review of Cuties’ content reveals that any attempt to defend it is equivalent to defending the filming of an actual murder in an effort to teach viewers that murder is wrong.
This video may contain copyrighted content. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for -fair use- for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
HARASSMENT NOTICE
It is not my intention to cause the original video creator(s) to receive any kind of harassment or abuse. It is my intention to provide a counter argument to the claims they have made. While I have no control over the feedback you choose to provide, I ask that you avoid any forms of harassment or abuse.
CHILDREN’S PRIVACY NOTICE
This video is NOT targeted to viewers under the age of 13. I do not collect, use, or disclose information from children on any platform where this video is hosted.
I don’t mean to beat a dead horse, but Tomi Lahren has attempted to defend herself, posting a follow-up video to her “PSA for Boyish Men” rant, on August 6th, 2020. While I did not review the entire video, Tomi has something interesting to say about her ex-fiance Brandon Fricke. In saying it, Tomi Lahren proves once and for all what a piece of crap she really is, and why no high quality man would ever want her as a committed partner.
My original response to Tomi’s first video, “PSA for Boyish Men,” can be found here: https://youtu.be/oDeZkNwY03s
This video may contain copyrighted content. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for -fair use- for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
HARASSMENT NOTICE
It is not my intention to cause the original video creator(s) to receive any kind of harassment or abuse. It is my intention to provide a counter argument to the claims they have made. While I have no control over the feedback you choose to provide, I ask that you avoid any forms of harassment or abuse.
CHILDREN’S PRIVACY NOTICE
This video is NOT targeted to viewers under the age of 13. I do not collect, use, or disclose information from children on any platform where this video is hosted.
My 2 Cents 